IT’S easy enough to pick out the star bike racers of the last year – they’re the ones with world championships to their names and trophy shelves that are cracking under the strain of the silverware they’re loaded with – but which bikes have impressed most of all?
On reflection it’s a tougher question than it first appears. Our initial thoughts were simply to rate them based on race wins, but that gives an advantage to bikes running in championships with more rounds. Then we considered ranking them based on their win ratio – what percentage of wins did they get from the total number of races entered? Better, but such a formula creates a natural bias to models that dominate the entry lists.
So we’ve come up with a formula that takes the percentage of races that each bike has won divided by the percentage of the grid that model makes up. So if a particular model somehow made up 100% of the field, and hence won 100% of the races, it would score an overall figure of 1. If a model that made up 50% of the grid managed to win 100% of the races, it would score 2. Grid sizes are calculated using full-time riders
Sure, it’s still open to argument – there’s bound to be plenty in the comments below – but it’s something approaching a ‘fair’ system that eliminates variables to show up which bikes performed the best over the course of the season.
We’ve taken our shortlist from the bikes that won rounds of the most high-profile international championships – MotoGP, Moto2 and Moto3 plus WSBK and WSS – to ensure that we’re comparing machines helmed by the best riders and prepared by the best teams.