Policewoman struggles with mini bike
Check out this amusing video of a female police officer riding a confiscated mini-bike in her office
It's always amusing when the police film themselves making a complete arse of something and this is a great example. Check out her amazing clutch control..
Discuss this story
what cake , I didn't get any cake ( walks of in strop)
Posted: 25/11/2008 at 15:30
happy birthday lee heres a cake specially for you
happy birthday
This one,your quite welcome to it mate 
Posted: 25/11/2008 at 15:35
usual double standards. It is being ridden in an office lol! Possibly funniest thing I have seen in a while
Posted: 28/11/2008 at 19:16
No helmet or protective gear, I couldn't see a number plate either. This is disgusting, I demand some compensation for the trauma this has put me through. I'll have about £1,000,000 please
Posted: 28/11/2008 at 19:24
M,m,m,m,monkey, m,m,m,m,monkey, m,m,m,m,monkey, m,m,m,m,monkey, I am the monkey, I can go anywhere, I am the monkey, I can go anywhere, I am the monkey, I can go anywhere, including here and here and here......
Posted: 28/11/2008 at 19:29
The police are forever complaining about the lack of respect they receive from the public and amount of time consuming paperwork they are burdened with, yet they seem to have time for mini bike riding indoors and time to post shite like this on U-tube. I wonder if they conducted an investigation to find out who the responsible parties are so they could prosecute and fine them, just as they would if it were a video of a speeding biker? Talk about double fookin standards! I would like to read in the news about the lot being prosecuted and sacked. Ask yourself, would you want a silly git like that policing your community? Better yet, try calling your local coppers and try getting them to come out to a crime. I am starting to think we might be better off without them, if we aren’t already without them?
Yeah god forbid that they would have a sense of fun/humour and fuck about for 5 minutes...sack them all..good call
Out of interest what do you think they should be prosecuted for??
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 19:41
The police are forever complaining about the lack of respect they receive from the public and amount of time consuming paperwork they are burdened with, yet they seem to have time for mini bike riding indoors and time to post shite like this on U-tube. I wonder if they conducted an investigation to find out who the responsible parties are so they could prosecute and fine them, just as they would if it were a video of a speeding biker? Talk about double fookin standards! I would like to read in the news about the lot being prosecuted and sacked. Ask yourself, would you want a silly git like that policing your community? Better yet, try calling your local coppers and try getting them to come out to a crime. I am starting to think we might be better off without them, if we aren’t already without them?
Yeah god forbid that they would have a sense of fun/humour and fuck about for 5 minutes...sack them all..good call
Out of interest what do you think they should be prosecuted for??
in fairness gedge it is double standards,if some young scrote was fucking about like that for 5 minutes and plod witnessed it he would be arrested.
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 20:53
The police are forever complaining about the lack of respect they receive from the public and amount of time consuming paperwork they are burdened with, yet they seem to have time for mini bike riding indoors and time to post shite like this on U-tube. I wonder if they conducted an investigation to find out who the responsible parties are so they could prosecute and fine them, just as they would if it were a video of a speeding biker? Talk about double fookin standards! I would like to read in the news about the lot being prosecuted and sacked. Ask yourself, would you want a silly git like that policing your community? Better yet, try calling your local coppers and try getting them to come out to a crime. I am starting to think we might be better off without them, if we aren’t already without them?
Yeah god forbid that they would have a sense of fun/humour and fuck about for 5 minutes...sack them all..good call
Out of interest what do you think they should be prosecuted for??
in fairness gedge it is double standards,if some young scrote was fucking about like that for 5 minutes and plod witnessed it he would be arrested.
Wavy, but they are INSIDE a building not on the road! Regardless what people think of the Police when was the last time you heard of someone getting ticketed for riding a bike inside their ownhome??
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 20:58
The police are forever complaining about the lack of respect they receive from the public and amount of time consuming paperwork they are burdened with, yet they seem to have time for mini bike riding indoors and time to post shite like this on U-tube. I wonder if they conducted an investigation to find out who the responsible parties are so they could prosecute and fine them, just as they would if it were a video of a speeding biker? Talk about double fookin standards! I would like to read in the news about the lot being prosecuted and sacked. Ask yourself, would you want a silly git like that policing your community? Better yet, try calling your local coppers and try getting them to come out to a crime. I am starting to think we might be better off without them, if we aren’t already without them?
Yeah god forbid that they would have a sense of fun/humour and fuck about for 5 minutes...sack them all..good call
Out of interest what do you think they should be prosecuted for??
in fairness gedge it is double standards,if some young scrote was fucking about like that for 5 minutes and plod witnessed it he would be arrested.
Wavy, but they are INSIDE a building not on the road! Regardless what people think of the Police when was the last time you heard of someone getting ticketed for riding a bike inside their ownhome??
what if some young scote had been inside a public building? why can't you people just admit you're not always right and you make mistakes as well as the general public.
if some young scrote was acting the same way as that policewoman,you would have nicked him.
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:09
For what offence..They are inside their own offices, no public access..AFAIK the road traffic act doesn't apply in there. It was piece of stupidity but hardly one warranting demands for a sacking..its a ( I presume) seized minibike thats on its way to the crusher so unlikely to be any claim for damage to it.. and I am pretty sure that once the video has been aired she ( and others ) will have been disciplined..IMO thats all thats needed...
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:15
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OYr771w9wS4 She certainly didn't watch the above clip and learn 
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:16
String them all up, I say. I bet they're immigrants, probably illegal - I didn't see a Union Jack tattoo on any of them
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:19
For what offence..They are inside their own offices, no public access..AFAIK the road traffic act doesn't apply in there. It was piece of stupidity but hardly one warranting demands for a sacking..its a ( I presume) seized minibike thats on its way to the crusher so unlikely to be any claim for damage to it.. and I am pretty sure that once the video has been aired she ( and others ) will have been disciplined..IMO thats all thats needed...
i haven't mentioned the road traffic act or sacking her. i'm saying the police would have charged somebody else with an offence. how about criminal damage that's one the police like to use when all else fails. there was obviously damage done in the incident,no matter how little.and it's not her office so she would have caused damage to property not belonging to herself.
all i'm saying is,if that had been some young lad in an office somewhere and the police had witnessed the incident or a third party made a complaint he would have been arrested.
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:25
i haven't mentioned the road traffic act or sacking her. i'm saying the police would have charged somebody else with an offence. how about criminal damage that's one the police like to use when all else fails. there was obviously damage done in the incident,no matter how little.and it's not her office so she would have caused damage to property not belonging to herself.
all i'm saying is,if that had been some young lad in an office somewhere and the police had witnessed the incident or a third party made a complaint he would have been arrested.
I would be happy to bet that similar incidents have occurred in bike shops/ workshops and garages even sitting rooms without the need to prosecute anyone..it certainly happened in my mates paint shop when his mate failed to complete a donut properly..
as I have already said..Its a bit of unnecessary tomfoolery that ended predictably badly.. internal discipline is more than sufficient.....try and see the funny side of it...I am sure you would be pissing yourself laughing if it had been anyone other than a police officer..
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:33
For what offence..They are inside their own offices, no public access..AFAIK the road traffic act doesn't apply in there. It was piece of stupidity but hardly one warranting demands for a sacking..its a ( I presume) seized minibike thats on its way to the crusher so unlikely to be any claim for damage to it.. and I am pretty sure that once the video has been aired she ( and others ) will have been disciplined..IMO thats all thats needed...
i haven't mentioned the road traffic act or sacking her. i'm saying the police would have charged somebody else with an offence. how about criminal damage that's one the police like to use when all else fails. there was obviously damage done in the incident,no matter how little.and it's not her office so she would have caused damage to property not belonging to herself.
all i'm saying is,if that had been some young lad in an office somewhere and the police had witnessed the incident or a third party made a complaint he would have been arrested.
I think the point is, that it is not her office or her bike or her furniture, the public pay for the items and her uniform and wages, so would this not be criminal damage of public property? 
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:34
For what offence..They are inside their own offices, no public access..AFAIK the road traffic act doesn't apply in there. It was piece of stupidity but hardly one warranting demands for a sacking..its a ( I presume) seized minibike thats on its way to the crusher so unlikely to be any claim for damage to it.. and I am pretty sure that once the video has been aired she ( and others ) will have been disciplined..IMO thats all thats needed...
i haven't mentioned the road traffic act or sacking her. i'm saying the police would have charged somebody else with an offence. how about criminal damage that's one the police like to use when all else fails. there was obviously damage done in the incident,no matter how little.and it's not her office so she would have caused damage to property not belonging to herself.
all i'm saying is,if that had been some young lad in an office somewhere and the police had witnessed the incident or a third party made a complaint he would have been arrested.
I think the point is, that it is not her office or her bike or her furniture, the public pay for the items and her uniform and wages, so would this not be criminal damage of public property?
Yes it could be..doesn't mean its necessarily appropriate to prosecute though.
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 21:40
For what offence..They are inside their own offices, no public access..AFAIK the road traffic act doesn't apply in there. It was piece of stupidity but hardly one warranting demands for a sacking..its a ( I presume) seized minibike thats on its way to the crusher so unlikely to be any claim for damage to it.. and I am pretty sure that once the video has been aired she ( and others ) will have been disciplined..IMO thats all thats needed...
i haven't mentioned the road traffic act or sacking her. i'm saying the police would have charged somebody else with an offence. how about criminal damage that's one the police like to use when all else fails. there was obviously damage done in the incident,no matter how little.and it's not her office so she would have caused damage to property not belonging to herself.
all i'm saying is,if that had been some young lad in an office somewhere and the police had witnessed the incident or a third party made a complaint he would have been arrested.
I think the point is, that it is not her office or her bike or her furniture, the public pay for the items and her uniform and wages, so would this not be criminal damage of public property?
Yes it could be..doesn't mean its necessarily appropriate to prosecute though.
but you would if it was some young chav ,why can't you just admit it,. never thought of you as a bigot gedge.
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 22:13
Dave..I lost count of the number of young chavs I caught fucking about and let off with a warning..not a bigot at all.. read my posts..I dont say its acceptable..but it happens ( on all jobs IME) and there are perfecty adequate procedures in place for dealing with it without calling for prosecutions or sackings..
Posted: 30/11/2008 at 22:38
LOL what a tado about nothing ......................hello gedge ............remember me? so how ya doing ? hows life outside?.........still counting down here 
last time we spoke you were on gardening leave just waiting for your cheque.................. same old same old............................................
Posted: 10/06/2011 at 00:03
|
|
