must be as it's the single's simplicity that I admire the most.Read more: http://www.visordown.com/road-tests-first-rides/first-ride-2012-ktm-duke-690-review/19934.html#ixzz2Cqjkol2j cambangdingalosa: So good the wife bought one as well! Strengths

style, matched to the clean, yet vibrant choice of colours. Orange or white for show, black for mean and moody. The 690 Duke errs much more towards the standout with its angular looks. I don’t know what it is, but looking at the faces of these two bikes

In short:Neatly fills the gap between the 200 and 690 Dukes Pros:Neatly fills the gap between the 200 and 690 Dukes Cons:Neatly fills the gap between the 200 and 690 Dukes Production date: 2013 Engine capacity: 373cc Power: 43bhp Torque: 26lb ft

Top speed: 115mph Engine capacity: 690cc Power: 72bhp Weight: 148kg Seat height: 865mm Fuel capacity: 13.5L

frame and components fo rht enewly release 200cc version. In fact the WP fork numbers appear to be the same as used on the 2012 Duke 690, although i would expect the internals to be a little different.if you are going to buy one I have a couple of tips

. I can't wait for the 690 Duke if it as good as the 640 I'm buying 1, if its better I'm buying 2. George Stan: Top bike for hooligans Strengths: Really strong engine, pulls from really low all the way through the gears to over a ton, wheelies are a

the wrong bike. One tough negotiation later I was the proud owner of my mates 748SP and the Blade went. A 636 Kwak (underseat exhaust version) followed then a '06 Blade and finally a KTM 690 Duke. Last week I spotted a 19K 2000 Blade for sale and am now