This test is the biggest load of bollocks i ever read.
To say the GSXR 1000 is just too dated,too rampant and too poorly built is crap and totally defeats the object of this test as in my opinion you can not buy more fun for in my case £3000 for a mint less than 10.000 miles example.
I get tired of reading some of the rubbish these "so called" journalists put on paper,these people are not in the real world as they mostly ride brand new bikes and probbably not quite as fast as they would like you to believe,Nial Mackenzie/James whitham Excluded.
The mileage of the Suzuki GSXR tested is not even mentioned as it could have done 20000 miles and been neglected.
I own a GSXR 1000 K2 and i have also owned the latest crop of 1000's and the difference is minimal in all area's,in fact i reckon if a real and fair test was conducted between the "too old" and the latest k9 the original GSXR1000 would still be right up it there.
Posted: 16/09/2009 at 08:55