Road test: Aprilia Tuono vs. Triumph Speed Triple

Last year Aprilia's Tuono and Triumph's Speed Triple topped the street bike sales charts in the UK. What makes these bikes catch rider's imaginations

Posted: 19 December 2008
by Jon Urry

For all their might and development budgets there’s something the Japanese manufacturers are unable to pump into their bikes at will, and that’s soul.

It doesn’t matter if it has toe-curling bhp, suspension that can be adjusted in a multitude of directions or mind-bending futuristic design, if it lacks that certain X-factor it will leave the public cold. Sure, in certain classes you can negate the whole soul thing and sell on performance alone, but for some bikes this simply isn’t enough, which is where the Japanese struggle.

Last year in the UK despite Kawasaki launching the new Z1000, Suzuki the B-King and Yamaha refreshing the look of the FZ1 with more aggressive colours, the top selling street bikes were Triumph’s Speed Triple and Aprilia’s Tuono. Two old warhorses of the street bike class. So what is it that these bikes have that makes them so special?

To be fair describing the Triumph as a warhorse is a bit harsh. The Speed Triple itself dates back to almost the beginning of time (well, 1994) but the latest look, with stubby twin pipes, was debuted in 2005. It’s just that it feels like it’s been around for ages because it’s not that radical.

Look at the current, slightly modified with new wheels and subtle tweaks ‘08 bike and it’s instantly recognisable as a Speed Triple thanks to its twin headlights and chunky, rounded styling. A far cry from the likes of the Z1000 or Honda’s new CB1000R with their almost desperate-to-be-different style.

Then there is Aprilia’s Tuono, a bike that has steadfastly refused to change its look unless absolutely necessary. The only time this bike has been given a facelift was when its donor bike, the RSV-R, changed in 2003.

For 2004 we saw a new sharper Tuono, but that was the last time anything major happened. Well, if you take the sensible step of forgetting about the hideous gold frames of the Factory bikes. So what is the key to these bike’s  success in the UK?

The simple fact is that both of them come brimming with soul and character, and in a tough financial climate where buying a bike is such a major decision to most riders it’s this factor that is enough to sway a decision. Both the Tuono and Speed Triple feel like bikes that will be a part of your life for longer than just a few years, something that can’t be said about the slightly disposable feeling you get with the Japanese competition. But they do it in very different ways.

Continue Aprilia Tuono vs. Triumph Speed Triple



Previous article
BMW HP4: Niall Mackenzie's verdict
Next page
Page 2 of 2


MPG, price, review, for sale, parts, forum, specs, top speed, tyres, specifications, bhp, aprilia tuono, triumph speed triple, horsepower, pictures, seat height, oil, uk, exhaust
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Great road test from respected roadtester and journalist. However, as the owner of my second Tuono, currently an '08 Factory I find the suspension less harsh than Jon Urry and I find it soaks up poor roads well. OK it is firmer than my '03 Model but its a great bike ti ride long distances.

Posted: 19/12/2008 at 21:19

[quote]I always get the feeling that to ride a Tuono you have to be a real man, prepared to fight it every step of the way[/quote]

This made the Missus laugh, she doesn't seem to have any of the issues listed above while riding her Tuono about. She didn't seem to be struggling riding round Cadwell, or over the Alps in the snow, or along the Riviera in baking heat, or bimbling round the local b-roads, or hacking along on a ride out with our mates where ever really.


Posted: 21/12/2008 at 15:49

+1, My partner Deborah rides an 03 Tuono and loves it, especially when she gives the Power Rangers a run for their money on the twisties .

Posted: 28/12/2008 at 21:48

I bought a 2007 Speed Triple after becoming increasingly dissatisfied with a Fazer 1000. The Fazer was possibly the most boring way to travel at hyper speeds this side of a BMW Tourer. What I dislike most of all was the appalling lack of bottom end grunt (yes the EXUP valve was working). Having test ridden a 2008 Speed Triple, I immediately fell in love with the acres of bottom end torque and almost warp speed urgency of acceleration from tick over. It does not vibrate and shudder like a twin, just smooth raucouse power at any speed. So much so that I don't really recognise the reviewers description of what sounds like a sedate plodder. In fact is is far from dull and it edges closer towards utterly barking. As for the handling, both the Speed Triples I have ridden so far have very stiff suspension. On smooth tarmac the handling and suspension experience is like a well sorted race bike. On the bumpy backroads of Shropshire, the suspension is too harsh for comfort. Again I differ with the reviewer here. As for braking, don't even think of using more than two fingers on the front brake on the 2008 bike. It is incredibly powerful and retains good feed back. Not so good on the pre 2008 bikes which are more on or off. With the Fazer, I would often return from a ride wishing I hadn't bothered. The Triumph is the opposite, I come back buzzing. Blag a test ride or you will never know what you are missing.

Posted: 15/05/2009 at 18:19

Just bought a 6000 mile minted Tauono after having all sorts of bikes must admit was a bit dubious but have no complaints at all fast,comfy handles great and has the hooligan look and feel :) safe riding!

Posted: 02/03/2013 at 07:10

Talkback: Road test: Aprilia Tuono vs. Triumph Speed Triple