First Ride: Triumph Tiger Explorer 1200 review

Launch report

Posted: 27 February 2012
by Mark Forsyth
Sticking the boot in
1215cc of new engine with shaft drive. Just the job for a new range-topping tourer perhaps?
Triumph claim duck-beak helped with aerodynamics
Ten spoke cast wheels are very pretty

You can hardly accuse Triumph of rushing into the big adventure bike market. They’ve been incubating and hatching the 1200 Tiger Explorer since July 2006. Yes, since before the World went into financial freefall.

But the gestation wasn’t helped by the fact that they had to design and build a brand new engine as well as a brand new bike. The Explorer’s 1215cc three-cylinder motor shares no parts and no dimensions with any other engine in the current Triumph range. It is a clean sheet. Brand spankin' new.

Having ridden the rival’s offerings first it was clear to the Triumph design team from the offset that it wasn’t going to be possible to pluck an engine from the existing range and adapt it for use in the new adventure bike. Torque and power characteristics are one thing but 10,000 mile service intervals, a 950W generator and shaft final drive are another thing altogether.

From the onset, the design-goals were clear. The new bike had to be comfortable and easy to use for two people, it had to be durable and reliable and it had to be bristling with gadgets. Or as they say in the car trade, fully loaded.

The engine has been designed to have as few external oil and water pipes as possible. This may be bad news for Samco but it’s good news for owners – especially in terms of reliability and ease of servicing.

Those three (of course) cylinders run 85x71.4mm bore and stroke dimensions and a full ride-by-wire Keihin fuel injection system takes care of a number of important aspects such as European emissions laws, cruise control, traction control and capping the top speed to 220kmh (for hard-luggage stability issues). The double overhead camshafts are driven by a durable chain.

A 950w alternator nestles behind the cylinders and employs a free-wheel device so on reverse loads it keeps spinning (and producing power) and avoids the kind of forces that tend to trouble fast-spinning bearings. Besides, putting an alternator this size on the end of the crankshaft would have made the engine very wide. An external flywheel sits under the nearside engine casing where the alternator ‘should’ be. Not only is the alternator capable of powering a small hamlet, but so too is the battery – just the job if you’re going to leave your bike idle for weeks or months in between rides or plug heated underclothing in for hours at a time.

Power? Triumph claim a peak figure of 137PS and – the most crucial part – a peak torque figure of 121Nm delivered at 6,400rpm.

Before I get on to the riding part let me tell you this: the 1200 Explorer comes, as standard, with traction control, ABS, cruise control and heated grips. I’ll have to tell you about the raft of optional extras in a totally different story as they're so expansive.

I only got four hours on the bike so my findings are by no means conclusive but having spent a few weeks on BMW’s big GS at the tail end of last year and a day on Honda’s new Crosstourer last week I got long enough on the Explorer to form some opinions.

At a claimed 260kgs wet the Tiger Explorer is no lightweight but it’s 10 kilos lighter than the Crosstourer. But both are big bikes that hide their weight well as the centre of gravity is noticeably lower than BMW’s monster-tall GS. Just paddling around the car park I felt comfortably in control of the Explorer and even doing u-turns on rocky gravel it never felt like it was going to get the better of me. The riding position helps here, too. You’re sat ‘in’ the bike with plenty of space and even with short legs it’s easy to get your feet on the floor because the back of the tank’s so narrow. The seat has two height positions (optional saddles offer a seat height range from 810mm to 880mm!) and the footrests are mounted low enough to create some leg space to avoid cramps.

Jab the starter button and the big triple whines into life. It’s responsive and smooth and sounds great when you apply some revs – a nice balance between not too noisy and not too quiet. The standard end can produces a real rasp under load but in no way would it become tiringly noisy on a long run.

The hydraulic clutch action is as light as the throttle and first gear snicks home quietly. The shaft drive system is so slick and unobtrusive, you'd swear it was a chain driving the back wheel.

Hardly surprisingly bearing in mind its 1215cc, the Explorer pulls hard from low down. The torque delivery isn’t as rip-your-arms-out as the Honda Crosstourer from idle speeds but the engine really feels to get into its purple patch at around 5-6,000rpm and this is where I seemed to be spending most of my time, especially when we upped the pace a bit. 

The poorly surfaced, shiny roads may not have been the best place to check out Metzeler’s Tourance EXP tyres (17in rear, 19in front) but it did let me try out Triumph’s ABS and traction control a few times. It works well. If you don’t want either of these systems, you can disable them using the clever dashboard menu system. Brakes? One finger operation is more than adequate. Masses of power, masses of feel.

Click here for page 2 of 2 of the Triumph Tiger Explorer review.



Previous article
First Ride: Harley-Davidson Breakout review
Next page


triumph tiger explorer review, tiger test, verdict, price, weigt, bhp, top speed, mpg, accessories, launch, seat height, specs, power, brakes, oil, servicing, cost, price, new, uk, for sale
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

They won't tempt the beemer riders to switch with this bike because 1. They are so far up their own arses no one can see them and 2. Triumphs finishing quality is not that great. That leaves the Crosstourer. The best built of the lot and probably the most suited to the road. I haven't met a single person yet who owns a GS that has taken it off tarmac for more than 30ft.

Posted: 27/02/2012 at 22:06

I love it when people just come up with sweeping generalizations. However, the beauty of the internet is that I can do the same thing! Triumphs finish quality is easily on a par with the Japanese.

And the only road the Crosstourer is more suited to is a short one!

You need to get out more and meet more people gs72!

Posted: 27/02/2012 at 23:58

I've had A Sprint ST since 2007 and the finish is still excellent despite me riding 11/12 of the year. I've owned many Japanese bikes and had finish problems with most, including Honda! Don't knock Triumph, they make excellent bikes with character. Better still buy one and see what you are missing. Test ride booked on the Adventure and looking forward to it.

Posted: 28/02/2012 at 06:45

@ gs72

Er, no. Finish is excellent on the new triumphs, as good as the japs if you ask me. I've got a Tiger 800 roadie and it looks lovely almost a year on after i bought it. I do agree with you about beemer owners though lol, that said BMW will lose sales as the Explorer will suit riders who fancy a change from the constant trips back to the dealer to fix issues on modern beemers. Time will tell regarding reliability but the simple fact is, you get more for your money with the Explorer when you price it up against a similar spec beemer, plus triumph owners don't look down on other types of bikes and riders, unlike a certain type of rider i could mention

Posted: 28/02/2012 at 09:47

Er!... My last 3 bikes have been GS's... and i'd always said if other manufacturers cud make a bike like the GS.. I'd consider changing... I haven't yet had the opportunity to test the Honda or the Explorer... but i've ridden all of the other offerings... But haven't been swayed as yet!.. Although I thought in terms of value for money the Kawasaki was ok..
The one single thing I've learnt to love on the GS.. Is the "no dive" tele-lever front end... and that is the one single thing that's kept moi on a GS... Perhaps its not for those that have always had sports bikes... But for those that move from them to any adventure bike will still have to come to terms with all that fork dive when riding hard.
Of all of the other offerings on the market at the moment the anticipation of getting aboard the Explorer excites me most.... But then again so does the spy shots of the all new water cooled Beemer!!

As far as off road riding on a Gs... Some actually do.. as I have.. Jus visit the GS forums and look at the pics!

Posted: 28/02/2012 at 16:52


MF

/members/images/232185/Gallery/bikefeet.com.jpg

 

I could carry on...


Posted: 28/02/2012 at 20:41

The only thing that will not sell me one of these new Triumph 1200's is the mad prices for servicing the Triumphs. Ask them how much they charge for servicing? A UK Triumph deal wanted 680 pounds Sterling to service my 09 1050 SE Tiger with only 1800 miles on the clock. It made me go back to BMW after having 2 great Triumphs, and Oh yes my head is still on my shoulders thank you. After owning all makes and kinds of bikes over the last 35 years, with 25 years of those on BMW's I have had Honda Kawasaki, Suzuki, Yamaha, Minsk and I look forward to 35 more years.

Posted: 28/02/2012 at 20:42


MF
Did you actually admit to owning a Minsk. In public? Your argument is in tatters...

Posted: 28/02/2012 at 20:48

My last bike was a GS1150 but i chopped it in in part ex for a Bonneville. I loved that big black beemer but it was so damn heavy it was impossible for me to pick it up when I dropped it in my garage [best place to do it?] I now love my Bonnie so much I'm treeting it to a pair of loud pipes.......... yeah ok, I'm a friggin hooligan. lol

Posted: 29/02/2012 at 08:42

Quite agree Anthony, I have had loads of bikes mostly Bm probably because they were different. Some BM owners are a bit aloof but then again so are others on all sorts of machines. Regarding build quality Triumph is far better than BMW. The 1050 Tiger owned had a brilliant finish. The Explorer will do well because the price is sensible in this playground.

Posted: 29/02/2012 at 13:20

I'm on my fourth GS having owned 2 x 1150s, a 12 and now an 800, so you coould say I am sold on this genre of bike. Am I a diehard BM fan? I don't think so but so far nobody has produced a bike (IMHO) that does for me what the GS does.

I congratulate Triumph on the Explorer (could it be more of a copy of the GS?) and I hope they do really well with it. It is priced competitively and if it proves reliable then it will take some market share. Will it be enough to entice GS riders away in their droves, I don't think so but it might entice riders into the Adventure bike market who may not consider a GS. The weight is disappointing and I think the fuel economy will suffer accordingly and whether we like it or not that is now very much a factor to be considered as the cost of a dwindling resource climbs ever higher. Other factors are the high price of servicing (already mentioned) and the Triumph Factory Warranty department do not have a great reputation.

I think the Explorer will prove to be a very good long distance tourer but don't expect to see too many crossing deserts, Siberia or places like the Dalton Highway - all places that have been successfully conquered by a GS.

I thought the review was thoughtfully written and took into consideration the brief length of time the writer was allowed on the bike. Unlike the equivelant MCN report which frankly was a total joke.

So well done Triumph, the more competetion in the Adventure bike market the better as it will keep the manufacturers on their toes and continue to improve the class.

Posted: 29/02/2012 at 13:43

I have a 2009 Triumph Tiger 1050 which is beautifully finished, reliable, economical and great fun. Servicing costs are very reasonable - £150 for 6,000 service at A1 Moto York who really look after you!
I have twice tried 1200 GS's, but not for me. I have many friends who have had many service/warranty problems and breakdowns. Most BMW owners complain bitterly about astronomical service costs.

Posted: 29/02/2012 at 16:29

To clarify my earlier points which so many people have decided to disagree with - I bought a new Tiger 1050 with the worst gearbox I have ever had on a bike. I currently have a brand new Street Triple R with a rear wheel so badly cast it is dangerous to the point Triumph are replacing it along with the brake rotor and axle bolt. So, go shove your generalisations up your backsides. On the other hand I've had two Blades and a CBR600F and each one trumps the Trumpets on finishing quality.

Posted: 01/03/2012 at 23:22

I had a Triple 1050. Apart from the cam chain jumping,the rear wheel adjusting hub seizing & the rear suspension linkage bearings turning into mush it was pretty reliable.
As for the BM riders thinking they're a "cut above the rest" I now ride an F800r. I let onto other riders but they don't always let on back. It's the individual riders that don't "give the nod" not the brand.

Posted: 03/03/2012 at 19:26

I have 3 triumphs all with excellent reliability. The S3 is a beautiful machine. Go away trolls.

Posted: 04/03/2012 at 04:35

I have had 2 GS bikes now, currently on a GSA - what a fantastic bike - have I ever been off road on it - not intentially, I bought it as a road bike.
However, as soon as I saw the new Triumph 1200 Explorer I put my GS up for part x. One of the main reasons was not that I disliked the GS - far from it, but it was the embarresment of being tagged as a GS rider. Technically the GS is one of the best bikes I have ever ridden on the road and on a track.
Cannot wait to pick the new bike up in about 2 weeks time - always wanted a Triumph and now one has come a long I want. The reviews so far are awesome.

Posted: 09/03/2012 at 13:35

I owned a 2006 Fazer for 6 years and 40 000 miles. It was showing its age but I could not find another bike which offered the combined comfort, usability and performance in one package. I eventually bought a demo newer model Fazer but took it back 2 days later (dealers px condition of sale) as the bike was more like a super bike. I was highly disapointed that Yamaha had ruined what was a brilliant bike! The dealer had a second hand Tiger 1050 on the floor and told me to try it. After 5 minutes on the bike I was in love. The power delivery from the triple motor just made riding the bike such a pleasure. Not to mention the comfort and rock solid handling. I will be test riding the new 1200 as soon as its available in South Africa as it looks to be another great bike from Triumph.

Posted: 09/03/2012 at 18:20

From what I've read, the only drawbacks I can see is the extra weight and fuel tank capacity. I own a 2006 955 Tiger and that 6.2 gallon (US) tank gives me a 250 mile range and there has been more than once in my travels that I have needed that range. The fact that the Tiger models don't have a lot of flashy extras, like putting the turn signals in the hand guards (ala Ducati) or extra chrome is good. I can't wait to test ride one.

Posted: 21/04/2012 at 08:01

you should come to South Africa we ride all bikes everywhere man. even BMW's. We attended the adventure launch yesterday - and we rode it in proper road and offroad conditions. The finish is great - and whoever built it took care to produce a machine with passion. It is a fantastic bike and I could happily see myself heading off into the great wide open spaces on this one...
Aw what the heck Mondays open. see ya'll later.

Posted: 10/05/2012 at 18:20

". 260kgs of anything is too big for anything other than riding up a gravel drive. "........um.....is it me or did the old BMW 1150 GS not weight 259/260kg and prove that weight (while important) isn't a defining element of the bikes ability off road? I like that the GS 1200 is now 30kg lighter, but the explorer is a triple so I will withhold sweeping claims about its off road prowess until its been properly compared. I am optimistic though!

Posted: 12/05/2012 at 13:11

Gumshot destroys his own argument by his daft abuse of other bike owners. This is childish and simpleminded. Nobody minds who likes or doesn't like any bike, but intelligent people make their point in a more adult way.

Gumshit is all hot air, and is a pub bore. He is like those teenybop magazines where kiddies talk about their favourite colour or boy band. Very embarrassing.

I bet he hasn't got a boyfriend or girlfriend.... Maybe a scooter.....?


Posted: 12/05/2012 at 13:34

Hi I have just read this review; I think a few of you have got a bit of track with the whole comments thing on others options, so I will NOT go there in a negative way. I have been waiting for a Triumph to "bring it” to the GS, hopefully the 1200 has the goods. I am from Australia and have ridden quite allot of it. My present bike is a 2006 Tiger, I have ridden the 1050 and the 800 personally didn’t go much on them, Don’t get me wrong their great bikes (just a personal choice) I prefer my 955, A mate I go ridding with has a 800 tiger , and a fire blade. He loves the tiger that it goes hard in the twistie stuff, comfortable on a long trip, and goes hard with in in the bush. I have taken the 955 over some pretty rough riding’ to top heavy and I am a short rider so I cannot paddle, with the 1200 not that I have ridden one’ but maybe the 1200 is sort of in the middle ,that’s why I mainly keep my 955 for sealed roads and mainly well-formed dirt. I also own a DRZ 400 E (and most reviews say they are a heavy bike to ride around the bush) this is true, But I will continue to use it for the off road stuff. Charley Boorman " from long way down etc, road a DRZ 400 in Australia in that show around the world by any means ? Well I live in that area of Australia, Cairns, the Great Barrier Reef etc, some mates and myself am doing Cape York ride next year on a DRZ and whatever else comes along. I did talk to a block that done the Cape on a Tiger 955, (that’s hard core) so what’s the point of all my waffle,. I think in doesn’t matter how or what bike you ride, It’s how you set it up , your ability as a rider, and what you won’t it for. If it’s to pose on that you have got one ( then buy a Harley) or like they say “ all the gear a no idea” I own my 955 because I love how it handles good on long trips , reliable, and my DRZ for going sick in the bush. I will be test ridding a 1200 tiger this week if I like it may get one in the next year or so. Would use it the same way I use the 955. At the end of day it a personal choice so happy days, trails and many Adventures to all 2 wheels petrol heads out there.

Posted: 04/06/2012 at 23:23


JJN
just bought the explorer ..having owned a GS..I find the explorer more user friendly ..and I wont do a long way round or even take it off road, but both bikes claim to allow you to do this..guess up to the owner then..

few comments above getting heavy..is biking about choice and individual at that..i work in Russia and the guys here an average tour without leaving the country is twice around UK ))) and the roads as our Ewan and Charley have shown are not exactly tarmac billiard table smooth..Magadan from Moscow is a regular trip for these guys and not on any of the adventure bikes we love.. too heavy :)

GS HONDA TRIUMPH...your choice all great bikes...

Posted: 22/05/2013 at 11:50

Hmm

Posted: 11/06/2013 at 21:54

And there lays the basic issue with these bikes, the people who own them. I have steered well clear of any Charlie / Ewen clone because of the type of biker they represent...and unfortunately most bike riders see this before they see the bike for what it is, they judge the rider first and not the machine
Now before you all blow a gasket, sit back and think for a moment.
How many actually ride a bike of road or go on an *adventure*? less than 5% probably, a bit like Range Rover owners.

Now with all that said, for the first time in 33 years of constant riding i decided to take 2 days out and test ride as many *adventure* bikes as i could fit in the 48 hours available. The BMW was my first port of call, having many friends who own BM's i thought i would check out the perceived market leader first, then off to Ducati for the 1200 MS, Then to Honda, then Kawasaki (Versys 1000) ok i know its not quite the same sort of bike, and finally on to Triumph.
My feelings (being completely non-plused or biased) were interesting, i was looking for a daily ride, something to do massive distance on, comfy seating, good equipment level and reliability.
I have to say the Triumph far exceeded my wildest dreams, i handles well for a *big* bike, it pulls like a train in all gears, luggage is cavernous, equipment is top notch.
So why not a BMW? well i just didnt gell with it, it felt wooden and the nail in the coffin for all BM bikes is reliability...i have no confidence in its reliability at all. I have a lot of friends with all sorts of BM's, each and every one has been caught out with fuel pump issues, non starters after a 2 week break, and that god awful shaft drive....compared to the Trumpets shafty its positively agricultural.

So im placing my order as soon as my current track weapon is sold..Triumph it is.

Posted: 11/06/2013 at 22:15

Talkback: First Ride: Triumph Tiger Explorer 1200 review