First Ride: Harley-Davidson Sportster 72

Air cooled armpits

Posted: 9 February 2012
by mark forsyth
Not so much 'in the wind' as 'in the spume'
This Hipstamatic iPhone snap could be straight from 1972...

The Sportster is the Ducati Monster of the H-D family – entry level. Although you can trace the Sportster’s roots back to the 1952 Model K (the first unit-construcion Harley) it was the 1957 XL with its overhead valves that started the Sportster family tree for real.

Now THAT, is a long production run; for even though the engine has evolved over the years it’s still pretty much the same dimensions and layout as the 1957 original. And talk about versatile, it’s been successfully used for flat track racing and road racing, spawned the first Buells and has been a corner stone of the Hog family for nearly fifty years.

This, the 72, is the latest edition to the sporty saga and it takes its styling cues from the late 60's, early 70's West Coast choppers with ape hangers, forward controls, a super-skinny front end with a 21in front wheel and a peanut tank. In the flesh it looks more like something out of a custom builder’s shed than a Milwaukee production line. Purdy.

Jumping off the Softail Slim onto the 72 is a bit of a culture shock. It feels ridiculously slim with no tank to grip with your inner knees and even with those full-stretch bars it’s supremely easy to hurl from side to side. The motor’s faster to rev up too (all things being relative) and because it carries less flab (247kgs), the 72 feels altogether more lively and more responsive than the bigger Softail brethren.

Distant, forward control footrests feel strange at first but once you stop looking for pegs where you instinctively expect them to be, it starts to make sense. The footrests are quite a bit higher than the footboards of the Slim so there’s much more cornering ground clearance allowing me, when the opportunity arose, to cling to the bumper of the psychotic photographer’s Seat hire car when he decided to pull the pin. This would not have been possible on the Slim just because of its low footboards that kiss the tarmac early.

The 72 doesn’t wear any trick suspension. Rear shock travel is limited, to say the least, but the spring rates and damping qualities are well chosen and surprisingly firm. The narrowly spaced forks are the same – well matched to the conservatively dimensioned chassis. Put simply, for a bike like this it’s as good as you need. I’d say it handles well enough to keep up with most of your mates for a ride out if you’ve got some experience and are handy at reading roads.

Brakes? You’ll need four fingers to operate the font stopper (like the Slim) but if you’re riding it how it wants to be ridden (smooth use of massive engine braking) the brakes are kind of superfluous for anything other than stopping at junctions.

Until your mates choose to sit at 100mph on a motorway, that is. The 72 just isn’t cut out for this kind of riding. Well, with that human-parachute riding position that’s an obvious statement isn’t it? If you’re going to ride all day on fast roads, 70 is probably your limit but if you’ve got nine points on your licence and have no self control that may not be a bad thing, aye?

The punchy (yes, really) 1200cc motor and five speed box shovels up enough oomph to make overtaking safe and there’s enough on tap to have some fun with. She shakes and jostles a bit at tickover (you can see the whole engine jiggling about on its rubber mounts) but not many unpleasant vibes get through to the rider when you’re on the move. Again, thanks to its exaggerated crank throw , this motor is all about torque and even this ‘little’ Harley engine produces a whopping 96Nm at just 3,500rpm. To be honest, with this kind of power, five gears is probably one gear too many. The gear lever doesn’t get much use at all.

Considering the riding position that throws all your weight onto your coccyx, the two gallon tank is about as big as you’d want. With claimed mpg figures of more than 50 that’s just about as long as you’d want to travel before stopping to fill up and give your butt cheeks a well-earned rest.

Nope, the 72 is not a bike for those who want to ride to Marseille in a day. It’s made for bopping about, having fun, making nice noises and being seen on. I should imagine (especially in that beautiful Candy red paint) it’d also be a beautiful thing to just look at and clean as it ticks and pings itself cool in your garage. London Hipsters take note.

But its ace card is that it’s so easy to ride. It doesn’t really matter what gear you’re in, it’ll pull hard if you just open the taps. It’s really easy to manage at low speeds too, with a very low centre of gravity and one of the lowest seat heights in the business at 710mm. Even Douglas Bader could ride a 72. If he wasn't dead.

So, in summary, I liked the 72, it reminded me of a reliable vintage custom bike with modern day creature comforts and – importantly – warranted reliability and 12v electrics. It looks stunning, too. It’s probably most suited to someone who likes to ride an hour somewhere and an hour back again. Either that, or someone who never leaves the city and wants a bike that is easy to ride, is un-intimidating and, blimey, for a Harley, cheap.

The 72 pricing starts £8,695 and the must-have Candy metalflake paint is another £200 extra.    

All pics (except the bottom one which was me) by James Wright of Doublered fame

Have you got a Harley-Davidson? Review your bike here.



Previous article
First Ride: Ducati 1199 Panigale S review
Next article
First Ride: Harley-Davidson Softail Slim


Harley-Davidson, Sportster 72, 2012 MY
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Another "generic cruiser review" applied to a HArley. "Pegs feel distant...not instincitve..." err, not if you ride lots of cruisers. That's like saying "You have to lean forward which feels unnatural" on a Gixxer review. Can VD PLEASE get someone who knows how to review cruisers on their own merits vs other cruisers rather than as a break from the sportsbike-norm?

Posted: 09/02/2012 at 20:31

I thought it was a nice balanced review on both the Harley's from someone who is not your typical Harley rider, the sort of review that may influence those that wouldn't normally consider this style of bike.

Well done Mark.

Posted: 10/02/2012 at 08:39

But this "balanced introduction" is all there ever is for custom reviews. Two bikes from the same(ish) genre, but no attempt whatsoever to compare them to one another or to other rivals. Would you really see a fireblade review that spent a couple of paragraphs on "plastic, how strange" and made no mention of relative atributes?
Bike press in UK seems to do this. You get depth for 1000s, 600s and streetbikes. But Customs, supermotos, and dirtbikes are always presented in a superficial way full of covert "nice for a change but you want a sportsbike really" commentary.
I love sportsbikes (and dirt bikes) and customs. Just like I like microwaves and BBQs, but I don't expect to have the BBQ to be endlessly slated for not being a microwave.

Posted: 10/02/2012 at 17:17

Whoa there! Speaking as a long time HD aficionado, and therefore- used to reading years of nonplussed/ 2 star reviews of Milwaukee's finest, this piece gave me a little hope. And judging from other British traditionally sport-leaning publications (MCN, etc.)- those reviews have also been mostly, cautiously quite upbeat about the '72.

Harley had lost me a little in recent years to be honest and Triumph America/ Speedmaster were rushing to fill the void but this Sportster on steroids just feels very right and may just cause me to part with my well earned. It's so... audacious- that luscious paint job, ape hangers. I sat on the Honda Fury a few weeks back and thought to myself "Yeah- amazing looking but far too showy. You'll look like a dick." Whereas, this XL1200 has the retro vibe in spades yet JUST on the right side of tasteful AND it's a Harley Davidson as well! Great review & pics. Cheers!

Posted: 19/02/2012 at 00:30

see the official video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlAcnhSSAt4

Posted: 21/02/2012 at 15:55

Very Accurate review of the Harley Davidson Sportster 1200V 72. No doubt you have road tested the bike.

Posted: 04/06/2012 at 19:34

Talkback: First Ride: Harley-Davidson Sportster 72


Busiest motorcycle review conversations