First Ride: 2012 Triumph Street Triple R review

Middleweight heavyweight

Posted: 12 June 2012
by mark forsyth
Summer, remember that?

Poke yourself in both eyes and the Triumph Street Triple could be a Ducati Monster. Especially in red. In fact, shortly after this picture was taken, a bloke in a pub car park said to his girlfriend, ‘look, a Ducati Monster. I want one of those.’

I didn’t get the chance to ask him if he’d poked himself in the eyes.

The Street Triple is a much more complete bike, though, but the steering lock is just as bad as the Italian V-twin’s…

The Striple’s key advantages over ALL its opposition are its chassis balance, overall poise, outright performance, all-gear flexibility, civility, torque and unique noise. Quite a complete list of attributes, then...

Because this is effectively a 675 Daytona with the bodywork removed, Triumph have gone to great lengths to make the highly visible bits more appealing. The top handlebar mount is a good example of this. Nice casting, aye?

Weirdly, it uses the traditional Triumph logo not the revised one as seen on the tank. Logo/brand confusion...

Forget the logos. The heart of the delicious 675cc Street is the motor. It’s a jewel. It’ll pull sixth gear down to 15mph and still pull cleanly, even on a full throttle with the cables stretched. Amazing.

This cut-away shot (I got busy with a hacksaw and bastard file the other afternoon) graphically demonstrates the immaculate packaging job Triumph engineers have done. Note balance shafts driven off the front of the crank gear.

The engine is silky smooth. The bark and howl from the three inlet trumpets is intoxicating and the torque figures truly amazing for this class.

The on-paper performance figures don’t tell the whole story. Yes, it’s a detuned Daytona motor but the extra low-down torque this offers makes it very, very easy to ride quickly on the road

At the pointy end, radially mounted Nissin brakes are a really nice compromise between initial bite and feel/feedback. Power is massive – one finger strong.

Forks (and rear shock) offer a great compromise between control and comfort. I couldn’t provoke it into being even moderately unstable. 

It’s not the noise that these twin pipes make that are the most endearing aspect of the Striple. It’s the proper howl it makes when the throttle butterflies are jammed open.

The induction noise gets better the harder it revs. Addictive. Only passers-by get the benefit of the exhaust note…

Cast alloy swing-arm and machined alloy chain tensioners are beautiful. Matt, rough finish is very tactile and surprisingly easy to clean. The rest of the extrusions and castings of the frame are finished the same way. Classy.

Apologies for the massive chicken strips. It was early in the ride, OK?

It's not hard to see why the Street Triple has needed no updating, no tarting-up, no messing about with. In this capacity class it is still a World leader and, probably boxes its way into the 750 class by way of its elastic tractability and strong mid range torque.

(Still) Massively impressed.

RRP Price: Street Triple £6,899 and Street Triple R £7,599


Previous article
First ride: 2013 KTM Duke 390
Next article
First Ride: 2012 Triumph Speed Triple review


Triumph, 2012, Street Triple R
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Has it got 'Auntie Gladis' headlamps like its big bro?

Posted: 12/06/2012 at 17:26

Always loved the Street Triple, but it's design is starting to look a bit old to me. Lines are not unfamiliar to the CB919 from 10+ years ago. Still a nice looking bike but far from being innovative esthetically.

And those headlights, no matter how you look at them, they are just sticking out in an ugly fashion, windscreen shouldn't be an option, it's the only thing that helps a bit put those headlights back into proportion...

As for the engine, it is amazing, so is the sound. But that can be said about the new Brutale 675 and on top of that it looks like a "new" bike and makes the Street look...well..."old".

Posted: 12/06/2012 at 18:58


MF
Brutale 675 fuelling versus Triumph Street Triple fuelling? Aesthetics only go so far, you know...

Posted: 12/06/2012 at 19:10

They can do wonderous things to fueling with laptops these days.

Posted: 13/06/2012 at 14:18

The rear of the swinging-arm looks a tad weak to me! and the axle adjusters too long. Apart from that its ok.

Posted: 13/06/2012 at 16:18

I'm sure the last "secret" photo I saw of the 2012 street had a different swingarm

Posted: 14/06/2012 at 11:57

made a mistake it was 2013, http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/bikes/2013-triumph-street-triple-spy-phots/

Posted: 14/06/2012 at 12:03

All your pictures are of the R model...
... so what exactly did you test?

Posted: 16/06/2012 at 15:34

This is the R version that you are riding as the standard street doesn't have radial brakes.There is no brembo upgrade on the R.Lazy reporting

Posted: 16/06/2012 at 17:19

thats why the title says "street triple 'R'"!

lazy reading

Posted: 28/06/2012 at 18:11

jwer23 - it didn't when it was first published...

... and the spec sheet is still from the standard model...

Posted: 05/07/2012 at 21:18

Talkback: First Ride: 2012 Triumph Street Triple R review