Most people here have good points.
You definitely can't hate stoner for his riding and no one here has said they don't like his riding. All agreed.
I'm not a Rossi fan (don't mind either way) so I'm not offended by comments about Rossi.
I too prefer something interesting being said rather than "bike good".
So I think it boils down to the fact that to ME -He seems unthankful and ungracious about the sport which I absolutely love. There's problems in all sports, be it holds up in qualifying through to politics. EVERY other rider has to deal with EXACTLY the same gripes.
Other riders say "It was busy, so I got a bit held up" and Stoner punches De Puniet on the arm. Can you IMAGINE if that were the other way around? Even the commentators remark on Stoner's double standards.
Every rider has to deal with politics. Stoner bashes the sport that's given him everything and quits.
He said he wants to show that Pedrosa isn't as good as everyone says he is. This is a perfect example. Why can't Pedrosa actually be allowed to be that good? Why can't he acknowledge it and just make sure he's better? Why can't he congratulate Bradl on his performance rather than say he was only good because of "Me crashing out"?
Stoner is on record winning because someone else crashed out and inferring that they made a mistake and he didn't so he was the better rider on the day. So Bradl wasn't the better rider, that only happens if it happens to Stoner??
I don't find anything he says informative. I find it generally quite obvious, whiny and generally about either excusing his not coming first or bashing MotoGP. Politics? Shock horror!! Holds ups? Only for you and no one else? Shock horror!! MotoGP is superior (i.e. "I'm superior) to Moto2 and Marquez will have to adapt his style? Shock horror!! Please enlighten me more.
Posted: 23/08/2012 at 10:31