Could external airbags save riders' lives?

Volvo's latest tech might help

Posted: 23 May 2012
by Visordown News


VOLVOS have long been seen, somehow, as the motorcyclist's enemy. Whether it's because their drivers are swaddled in a sea of impact-protection beams and airbags or simply because the firm's angular cars of old always looked like they'd be particularly unforgiving to crash into, Volvos and bikes just haven't mixed well in the past. But maybe that's changing.

OK, so the latest technology is aimed at pedestrians (you didn't think a car maker might have designed something specifically to help motorcyclists, did you?) but having run out of space for more airbags inside their cars Volvo is starting to put them on the outside, too.

Making its debut on the firm's new V40, the pedestrian airbag inflates from the rear edge of the bonnet, shielding the windscreen and pillars. Designed to operate only in specific circumstances – between 20 and 50km/h (12 and 31mph) and when the sensors in the front of the car recognise an impact with a human leg – the system not only deploys the airbag but raises the rear of the bonnet. That increases the gap between it and the hard engine bits beneath as well as helping deflect the pedestrian upwards and presumably over the car. The front of the bonnet can also move backwards, softening the impact.

Whether or not it will deploy when the car hits a bike has yet to be seen, but if it does, it can't make the rider's chances any worse. However, the fact it seems to largely obscure the driver's vision means you got to hope that after hitting one pedestrian the driver doesn't then plough into a whole pavement-full of others.

Previous article
Why advertisers need to do their homework
Next article
Triumph tests rocket parts


 
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

For sure.. even if it is only one life (especially great if that one life is your own or your family member)

But then again, so could cars made of jelly.

More driver training, awareness and attention could save more... but wouldn't sell as many cars and wouldn't allow automaker to charge for it

Posted: 23/05/2012 at 15:02

I"m not so sure they would work well on sports bikes but check out GOLD WING AIRBAG TEST on you tube ..A pal of mine has had the real experience of the Gold Wing air bag and is still here to tell the tale,!Bruised yes ,and sore arms and hands but little else.


Posted: 23/05/2012 at 15:36

What they don't tell you in the video is that there's a secret motorcycle detector. Once a motorbike is detected, it steers the car into the motorbike and upon impact, it drops a weapon and a bag of drugs in the unconscious riders' hands. It then rings the police for the driver and says that the offending bike rider was threatening murder and maiming of cute furry animals before he drove the back of his bike into the front of the car.

Volvo.

:D

Posted: 23/05/2012 at 18:10

Love it Maverick, love it.

Posted: 23/05/2012 at 22:46

Maybe if the basic design of cars was safer there would be less need for these add-ons.
Windscreeen pillars are now extremely thick on modern cars (much like many of the drivers!). Apparently in order to protect the occupants in a roll-over. How many cars roll? especially compared to the numbers of accidents caused by drivers vision being obscured by those same huge pillars.

I like to think i am a decent driver, with good hazard awareness due in part to my years on bikes. However i have now had a close call when converging traffic was hidden by the massively thick plllar so typical of modern cars.

Safety features will also have the disadvantage of removing drivers feelings of responsibilty for their actions, allowing them to feel safe and able to do what they like with little consequence.

The safest car for other road users would be one with a bloody great spike sticking out of the centre of the steering wheel. You could be damn sure the driver of that car would be extremely careful!

Posted: 24/05/2012 at 09:49

With all these new safety features it's much safer to have a chat on the mobile...
.

Posted: 24/05/2012 at 12:39

I doesn't matter if you cover the whole car with the things. If the damn driver doesn't bloody look what chance has anyone got?

Posted: 24/05/2012 at 12:41

Ok not a bad idea but somehow they seem to think the middle part of the windscreen will never get hit by the persons body, so it gets no airbag in that section??.
They need to add more airbag to the all important central part where most peoples head will land, and while you're at it make that part of the airbag of clear material as well so the poor pedestrian can see who the heck is trying to run them down.

Posted: 03/07/2012 at 17:13

Talkback: Could external airbags save riders' lives?


Latest discussions