MV F3: Why you will want one

Sub £10k price, MotoGP-style electronics and those looks. What's not to like?

Posted: 3 November 2011
by Visordown News

MV AGUSTA has revealed all the details of its new 675cc F3 triple and it's specifications live up to every last inch of those stunning looks. For a bike that costs no more than a Triumph Daytona 675R (and in Italy, it's as cheap as the basic Daytona!) it looks unbeatable.

So, what do you need to know. First up there's that engine. It might be a 675cc triple like the Daytona's, but it's got a reverse-rotating crankshaft (like several MotoGP bikes and, erm, the Foggy FP1), an idea that some suggest improves handling. Power is at Triumph levels with 126bhp, but on the MV it's tamed by a sophisticated traction control system, MVICS, that uses fly-by-wire for the throttle, with tunable and pre-selectable maps – eight in total - plus launch control and anti-wheelie as well as a quick shift. As well as engine and wheel-speed sensors there's a lean angle detector so the system knows everything except what you had for breakfast.

Obviously, it's still hard to overcome those old prejudices against Italian electronics, so the idea of such a techno-fest from MV might worry some, but Ducati has already proved that the idea that Italians can't do wiring just isn't true any more.

All that tech is wrapped in a typically MV-style chassis, with Marzocchi forks, a Sachs shock, the usual Brembo brakes and a dry weight of just 173kg.

So, a unique engine, unbeatable electronics, gorgeous looks and a price tag that competes with mass-made Japanese bikes of similar performance. Lets hope the MV factory can cope with the demand.



Previous article
MV Agusta F3 800 due early 2014
Next article
New Hyosung GT650?


2012, mv agusta, f3, 675, price, gallery, specs, specification
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Dear Father Christmas

GET ME AN MV!

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 09:19

Hmmm... that's odd... MV confirmed several times that the F3 would bring 135 BHP or more! Now it has the same amount of horsepower as the Daytona... and the same weight..... and the Daytona is 6 year old bike! Great those electronics.. if your a trackrider that is! And by the way: the MV needs 14.500 RPM for the 128 BHP, the Triumph needs 2000 rpm less... so I wonder which bike has the best midrange!

I'd wait for the new Daytona Triumph is working on... so: Why you will want one? I don't!

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 12:56

It sure does look pretty ;)

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 13:28

Deposit has been down for the last 4 months, even if the performance is similar to that of the Daytona 675 which I have now, it will be worth changing for the style alone, cannot wait.
But I will have to say the Daytona is a great bike

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 13:36

I really don't know people keep going on about how stunning looking MV's are. I can't see the appeal. Butt ugly mirrors come indicators, useless cyclops light and slam your nuts into the tank seat angle. Nice exhaust but I'll have the Triumph for so many other reasons.

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 22:22

Apart from the cans and seat unit, it takes so many cues from the F4 - an ancient, albeit pretty design now - that I really don't see anything that makes me go "wow" about this bike. Styling alone certainly doesn't justify the price tag, it has to be about the performance as well. If the Trumpet has the same figures, it seems that a F3 is going to be a £3000+ excuse for nothing more than trying to impress people by flinging a wedge of cash about.

If it hasn't been said before, I'll say it now - just who the fuck needs traction control on a 600? I hope I never meet that kind of rider on the road. They sound like accidents waiting to happen.

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 22:31

Who needs radial brakes on the road? Or 180bhp..? No-one, but it sells bikes...

Posted: 03/11/2011 at 23:18

Interesting. Does it actually sell bikes? Or could this sort of inflation-inducing nonsense be exactly why sports-bike sales are falling ever down?

All technology has its place but only in the correct application. Better (radial) braking is a poor example to use; everybody wants it everywhere, as safety demands it. Example; people are asking why no ABS is available for the F3. This would be a good application of technology which people will pay for. Opportunity missed.

Adding TC to the F3 is, however, providing an answer to a question that nobody has asked of a 600 - likely with next to zero performance or realistic safety benefit. I don't think I'm the only one who'd like the choice of paying less for an F3 without it. This is frivolous for anything other than a flagship model, which the F3 isn't.

MV always look for excuses to make their machines "exclusive" (dearer) and that is my bugbear. I'm not a technophobe, I enjoy technological advance as much as anyone but if I want proven technology and exclusivity I'd spend MORE on something else with genuine claims to and justification for both. That's why the pricing doesn't make sense, and why I will NOT want one - the price needs to be reflective of it's actual practical value, and not just pitched at what the company thinks the market will suffer for needless accessorising and a re-hash of an ageing, if pretty, aesthetic.

Posted: 04/11/2011 at 02:08

Let's not forget that the similarly priced Triumph Daytona has Ohnins all round as well as Brembos and makes the same power at less revs, not to mention a far better dealer and parts network. Gee, I wonder which one I would get?

Posted: 04/11/2011 at 07:09

Where do you get the £3000.00 plus from, it is only £200.00 more than the 675R

Posted: 04/11/2011 at 16:13

I think it's spurious to compare it to "R", this isn't their "premium" machine. It shares more in spirit to the base Daytona 675 in terms of the running gear. They are going for £7500 on Autotrader - seriously considering one. Pre-reg, I think. Check this out while the link works:

http://www4.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201133410394659/sort/priceasc/usedbikes/model/daytona/make/triumph/quicksearch/true/postcode/la59lu/page/18/radius/1500?logcode=p

I'd bet there will be OTR charges added to the MV as well. It's only going to get more expensive as time goes on.

Posted: 05/11/2011 at 08:33

Only time will tell, but I will post a report when I have one and can give a direct comparison to the 675.
At the moment all the postings are just words and not reality

Pre-reg at £7500.00 may be, but think about the re-sale value, I purchased a Fireblade in 2009 under similar circumstances and it was not such a good move

Posted: 05/11/2011 at 16:50

Price list

Triumph Daytona 675 = £8,499 = Kabaya Forks and Kabaya Rear Suspension
Triumph Daytona 675r = £ 9,999 = Ohlins Forks and Ohlins Rear Suspension

Mv Agusta F3 = £9,999 = ???
Mv Agusta F3 = £19,999 = Ohlins Forks and Ohlins Rear Suspension

Source = UK websites

Posted: 07/11/2011 at 09:38

I have been riding a 675SE for just over a year,8000 miles, rode a675R for a copule of weeks, yes, the handling was slightly better, but not that much to right home about

You cannot compare the F3 at £19,999 with the 675R, for it is a special edition, but you can compare the F3 at the CONFIRMED price of £9,999.
The minus may be the Ohlins, but just take a look at the plus's

Deposit down and looking forward to Jan/Feb or if necessary, will wait until the new registraions in March, only 4 months to go and counting

Posted: 07/11/2011 at 21:47

Talkback: MV F3: Why you will want one