Interesting. Does it actually sell bikes? Or could this sort of inflation-inducing nonsense be exactly why sports-bike sales are falling ever down?
All technology has its place but only in the correct application. Better (radial) braking is a poor example to use; everybody wants it everywhere, as safety demands it. Example; people are asking why no ABS is available for the F3. This would be a good application of technology which people will pay for. Opportunity missed.
Adding TC to the F3 is, however, providing an answer to a question that nobody has asked of a 600 - likely with next to zero performance or realistic safety benefit. I don't think I'm the only one who'd like the choice of paying less for an F3 without it. This is frivolous for anything other than a flagship model, which the F3 isn't.
MV always look for excuses to make their machines "exclusive" (dearer) and that is my bugbear. I'm not a technophobe, I enjoy technological advance as much as anyone but if I want proven technology and exclusivity I'd spend MORE on something else with genuine claims to and justification for both. That's why the pricing doesn't make sense, and why I will NOT want one - the price needs to be reflective of it's actual practical value, and not just pitched at what the company thinks the market will suffer for needless accessorising and a re-hash of an ageing, if pretty, aesthetic.
Posted: 04/11/2011 at 02:08