Mr Clegg, the George White model of operation encourages competition between the operators in the industry. This is ultimately the driving force of capitalism. the customer benefits from this, because they have more money to spend on ancilliary items, and if cheap enough will encourage the younger generation to take up the challenges of motorcycling as opposed to just cars. The influx and growth/acceptance of non-Japanese eastern motorcycles is testament to this.
The manufacturers hold the dealers to quota, the dealers need to buy and sell to match, with all the other costs on top it is tough to get everything right. The small dealer (of which I buy most of my bike requirements from locally, (except one or two items from Ebay, such as a new wheel), is running a business. Business is a risky venture and battered by market forces. If the problem as you suggest is the wholesale price of the new products, there can only be a few options to a dealer, get the manufacturer to adjust their price, change supplier, brand, buy Chinese, build the used part of the business, support the business with the sale of ancilliaries, cut the workforce, add brands to provide a bigger choice to the customer, add other sales lines workshop based, customising, race support or dyno facilities. it is a difficult choice, but my opinion still stands, the customer ends up paying more when the likes of a 'George white' leaves the market place.
if it is not what you want to hear, then it's a shame, margins are tight all over, not just within the motorcycling industry. In your opinion i don't know what i am talking about, ok, that's your opinion, I take it on board. i dissagree, i think I understand the issues very well, and there are a few ideas above to consider how to ensure the customer is the focus of the business model used, without flinging mud at the sad news of George White, me, you or Davie.
Posted: 24/01/2012 at 10:46