Prince Harry pulled over for 'no reason'

Police stop Royal whilst out for a spin on his Ducati 848 with a 'mystery blonde'

Posted: 18 June 2012
by Visordown News

Prince Harry bought the Ducati 848 back in 2010

ROYAL biker Prince Harry was pulled over by police whilst taking a 'mystery blonde' out for a ride on his Ducati 848, as revealed by The Sun.

The third-in-line for the throne was out riding on his Ducati across Putney Bridge, South West London to take his date for a "romantic picnic under the stars" when he was stopped by traffic police, despite doing nothing wrong.

A source told the paper that when he was asked to remove his helmet he declined and his minders stepped in, leaving the officer to embarrassingly apologise.

The incident is understood to have taken place between six and eight months ago and blonde's identity remains a secret, although at the time the Prince was attached to Mollie King from The Saturdays.


Previous article
Thief advertises stolen bike on Facebook
Next article
Motorcycle stuck in tree after crash


prince harry, ducati 848, pulled over, stopped, police, traffic, london
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

It's Harry, so he couldn't have been doing anything even remotely twattish. Oh, wait...

Posted: 18/06/2012 at 19:50


Posted: 18/06/2012 at 19:53

This is the guy who takes plenty of dosh from us, who dresses in Nazi uniforms and makes stupid comments about his role in the Army.

He should go and work for a living....


Posted: 18/06/2012 at 20:22

unrelated but i just tried to wipe the bug off my screen from my own avatar image.

Posted: 18/06/2012 at 21:48

It's tricked me more than once, I'm sad to admit. Even now I have to look at it twice.

Posted: 18/06/2012 at 22:05

Ah  - the ginger tosser! The man who does bad things to bad people, so basically above the law. Really puts you off owning an an 848 - rapidly becoming twats wheels!


Posted: 18/06/2012 at 22:41

@Hugh Jarse, could you explain makes comments about his role in the Army?

I'm guessing you're referring to how he "went" to Iraq only to be pulled back and says things lke "I dont want to be over here when our boys are over there"

Thing is that he could be being a tw@t or he could be genuine about the Army and want to do it for the same reasons anyone does: for Queen, country and to make a difference/defeat terrorism. We'll never really know which is the correct answer, we can only guess

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 01:40

Welcome to the normal biker world, Harry.

A Biker being pulled over "for no reason".
I got pulled over just so the Copper could ask "What is it? Bet it goes."

It is not Prince Harry that is wrong here. It the police that should not be above the law.
'No reason'.... then leave us the f*ck alone to ride our bikes!

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 06:32

@our man in Bangkok



Unlikely! The bloke's a 'Top Gun' remember? No doubt he was attempting to ferry the mystery blonde to somewhere where he could "Take her breath away!"

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 07:42

WTF is wrong with you all? Why do you all need to have a pop at the bloke? If it was anyone of you you'd all be fuming "that the f@cking pigs" had dared to pull you for nothing. He didn't complain about it, The Sun reported it, just like every other 'non-news' BS they publish.

Get a grip of yourselves...

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 08:40

Here, here Crownan, Harry even though he maybe a Ginger, (don't really care) hasn't done anything against me or anyone I know, yeah he was stupid for dressing up as a Nazi, but big deal, i'm sure i've done worse. I think the fact that both him and Wills ride bikes is a great thing for us biker who may very well be alive when one of them (most likely Will) take the throne, hopefully they can push for motorcyclists rights which have long been overshadowed. The majority of responses on here serve to only alienate them from us as a community of bikers, shame on you.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 08:46

So sad to read of tosh like "Queen and country". When will dopes like you ever learn to stop licking royal arse?

 

Thomp loves a royal riding a bike, imagining that it's good for biking. What a nickel plated wally.

 

Alienate the royals? 6 I'd make them work for a living instead of sponging off the rest of us.


Posted: 19/06/2012 at 08:57

It's pretty clear that the parasite was pulled for speeding while trying to impress his bird - is it not?

Because of who he is, not only does he believe he is beyond the law, but it then would appear that he's able to get away with it.

Anyone else - it would be "how many points officer?"

Doesn't take much to read between the lines does it? (in my opinion at least)


Posted: 19/06/2012 at 09:01

At the end of the day Britain is a monarchy as it always will be, people that bleat and moan about them taking our money dont seem to realise a presidential system would cost them even more. The monarchy is old and possibly outdated but at the end of the day they are a great bit of what this country is and anyone with communist / republican views should quite frankly emigrate out - France maybe I hear they have all sorts of oppressive rules for bikers coming in that should give you all something to whinge about.

Apart from that what Crownan and Thomp said - I concur

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 09:40

Just to dispel a myth:

I don't know all the details, but the monarchy did a deal with the government whereby they signed over most of their wealth and treasury to the government so the government could use that wealth for us and to run the country. In exchange they asked to be supported by taxes. Technically we're paying for them because they've paid for us, it's not one sided. We also pay taxes which pay for civil servants (councils, rubbish collectors, street cleaners etc) but we don't moan about that? The last time I checked though, no street cleaner brought in millions of pounds worth of tourism into the UK or created thousands of jobs.

I'm not pro royal or anything, I'm not really fussed about them at all but I thought I'd just stick a few facts in here rather than write a misguidedly popular statement like "Yeah, fck the royals, taking our taxes" :0)

As for Harry, the only thing I've ever noticed him say about the army is that he wants to fight like the other men and not be overly protected. Fair enough.

If this were any other person, we'd all be going "Can't believe the copper pulled him for no reason, glad he got off with no points"..

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 09:40

Just had a quick look and the monarchy costs us 60p each per year. The Queen and Prince Philip don't have to pay taxes but they still choose to anyway.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 09:49

Here we are, from someone much more clued up than me: :0)

The tax payer does not pay the Monarchy. It pays for the expenses of the Head of State. The Queen draws private income quite separately from the tax payer. All the expenses are already outweighed anyway as the Queen surrenders the profits from the crown estates in exchange for them. The profits from these estates are far larger than the cost of the Monarchy.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 09:50

Did anyone ask the Police why he was pulled over? Likely a quick text to the NOTW about his location, bung into said officers account and paps arrive smartish. Whoops that was pre levison.
He does not cost the country anything, seems much more switched on than his uncles Any and Ed. Does the UK good abroad, works hard, is rebellious.
I would rather have real royalty to speculate about the new monarchy, Rooney, Becks and Jordan.
He rides a bike, is not a tosser and therefore is one of us.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 10:02

made me smile,thanks

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 11:39

A source told the paper that when he was asked to remove his helmet he declined..............

Maybe he is "The Stig"????

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 13:21

What bunch of complete saddos! If you need to make a comment then talk about the police stopping bikers for no good reason - that is what the story is about. Nobody cares about your sad narrow views about the Royal Family except you! Get a life!

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 13:29

I've met the guy and served with his uncle.

He's about as far from being a twat as you can imagine. Likewise his brother. I'll leave the politics out of it, but would suggest that if you weren't there so you have no idea why he was pulled, and if you've not actually met him then you've no idea what he's like.

For the record, he's just a regular bloke. Works hard, really committed to his job(s) and enjoys a laugh.

As for the rest, I had honestly hoped that we'd moved on from this nonsense. But I get stopped regularly and patronised by coppers when I've done nothing, so I guess I'll have to live with the disappointment.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 14:37

who cares a shit about your daft information, go away would you.

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 15:28

I say it again. For the benefit of those who can't get the point.


It is not Prince Harry that is wrong here. It the police that should not be above the law.
'No reason'.... then leave us the f*ck alone to ride our bikes!

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 16:28

>Maybe he is "The Stig"????<

If so... then does that make Michael Schumacher a prince?? =8-)

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 16:42

I love the way everyone just ignored Michael's attempt at trolling :0)

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 17:20

You love it do you? Makes a change from beating your meat I suppose.

You've also got a stupid username.


Posted: 19/06/2012 at 19:25

Yellow says he's "met the guy and served with his uncle". What? as a servant? Did you polish his shoes, scrub the skidmarks out of his pants?

 

So you've met him - oo-er aren't you lucky; you've met a sponger, and a thicko as well. You'll get a medal for servility.


Posted: 19/06/2012 at 20:38

@ Hugh Jarse - how about you stop being a tw@t and explain the comment I asked you about: how Harry makes stupid comments about his role in the Army

Posted: 19/06/2012 at 22:06

So he got pulled over by plod, big deal. As a biker he has to get used to that sort of thing, we all do.
On the subject of refusing to take his helmet off: I wonder how he gets on going into filling stations and banks etc?

Posted: 20/06/2012 at 07:17

Well, Prince (jeezus, another one) . What comment are you droning on about?

If you said he was thick, I agree. You have to be thick to join the army, so that's normal.

 

I don't know what you're dribbling about.

 

You seem like yet another bicycle seat sniffer.


Posted: 20/06/2012 at 09:13

Hello Hugh. Sorry about the silly username, i'll get it changed right away mate..

Also, I like to just take a second to thank you for your factual offerings... :0)

Posted: 20/06/2012 at 09:30

lol and I guess hugh jarse isnt not a stupid name at all - nice to see even visordown has a resident troll.

Posted: 20/06/2012 at 09:59

Nothing wrong with a burn up with a bird up on the pillion!.....Did it all the time when I was his age......As for the helmet, I don't remove my helmet either. If the garage don't want my money, that's ok by me!

Posted: 20/06/2012 at 13:52

Well Splendid, I think you're the troll round here. What a useless contribution you made.

What a stupid name too.


Posted: 20/06/2012 at 19:58

@hugh Jarse Ahhh so the people defending your country from invasion, giving their lives overseas are "thick."

I'm sure you wouldn't mind telling them to their face then?

And what the fuck are you on about re: sniffing bicycle seats?

Posted: 20/06/2012 at 22:41

Hugh Jarse seems you can give it out but not take it - brave fellow


Posted: 20/06/2012 at 23:16

I know you can take it Slen - you spread 'em to do that. You cheeky thing.

 

Yes squaddies are thick - it's well known. I couldn't give a stuff about their wars overseas like Iraq, where there was no reason to invade - none at all. So belt up and get your facts right. And I have told them they were thick, and they wimped out.

 

Go back to sniffing bicycle seats you perv.

 


Posted: 21/06/2012 at 08:25

Oh dear Hugh Jarse. Your verbose projections could be made succint by not being so obtuse.

Posted: 21/06/2012 at 13:42

Indubitably and indefatigably.

 

"Verbose ejaculations" might be better, Mandy my sweet girlie.


Posted: 21/06/2012 at 15:38

See more comments...
Talkback: Prince Harry pulled over for 'no reason'