I've said it before, and I'm going to keep saying it. CRT is a good idea!! The above points are all very valid. It's going to take time, it always was, you simply cannot run any form of racing bike at the front or even near the front straight outta the box.
Deffo the top teams would still be the top teams if they ran CRT, that's a given. It just needs time and effort, which is gonna come.
I wouldn't say Aspar is a team with limited knowledge and funds Rob mate. With the factories, I reckon it's 2-3 years off yet, but it's coming, wether Dani Pedrosa or any of the rest of them like it or not.
I'm certain all the teams are using Bridgestones, there's no choice for them. Not really heard enough to know about them getting heat into them, but, given the stink Ducati kicked up about it last year, it's fairly odds on that Bridgestone have made some changes to the compounds they use.
Edwards spent most of Sepang sorting out electronics, and then trying to get to grips with the massive amount of chatter they had. Again, I've not heard much about what anyone else was working on a Valencia.
I did hear that Ten Kate are getting involved with Hiro's bike quite a bit, as Gresini haven't really had much experience with the Fireblade. The one thing that does worry me about CRT, and it's the only thing is the concept of a "tricked out superbike"...we really don't need another Superbike series, the one we've got is cracking already.
Given that the most expensive bit on these things is the electronics, I think it's gonna be a bit daft for Dorna to attempt to drive down costs and then let teams spend a fortune on ECU's and other jiggerypokery to make them go quick.
But, as you say Rob, once the factories properly get on board, it'll only be a matter of time before CRT is as quick as prototypes are now. Clever fella's make these things after all.
Posted: 16/02/2012 at 20:07