The £300,000 gold plated chopper

You might want to consider restoring the watermark and crediting the original photographer for his work. Image theft is considered bad form by some folks.
Posted: 13/07/2008 16:45

You might want to consider posting this on the thread thats already been started instead of posting up more crap threads.
Posted: 13/07/2008 17:01

Instead of jumping to conclusions you might also want to consider that the mods get sent lots of photographs of bikes to post and someone else may have removed the watermark.

Posted: 13/07/2008 17:14

Ditto on it being bad for the crop out the watermark. As a photog it seriously offends me that you would steal work from someone like this.
Posted: 14/07/2008 04:39

P050429X wrote (see)

You might want to consider posting this on the thread thats already been started instead of posting up more crap threads.

  Mea culpa. I'm not familiar with this forum interface. I thought I was commenting on the picture, not realizing I was initiating a thread.

AC wrote (see)

Instead of jumping to conclusions you might also want to consider that the mods get sent lots of photographs of bikes to post and someone else may have removed the watermark.

 One might assume that something posted under a heading of "news" in a forum so closely associated with a major publication would be held to something approaching journalistic standards. Perhaps I misunderstand the relationship between TWO and this site.

Posted: 14/07/2008 06:43

Where's the photo...?

I want to see the bike and it's supposed bling!

Posted: 15/07/2008 21:32

There's a link in the title - just don't be another photographer who's going to go off on one.
Posted: 15/07/2008 21:41