Supercharged 90bhp 100kg Cagiva Mito

An ant can defeat an elephant?  Has he taken a look at his Cagiva logo recently?

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 02:26

ohlins916sp wrote (see)

An ant can defeat an elephant?  Has he taken a look at his Cagiva logo recently?

 
Has he looked at his tyres?

....his bike [...] is perfect for road-riding.

   

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 08:25

I bet it's pretty good to ride...

Not sure about taking on all comers though...maybe on very tight turns...and I bet it stops well...

90bhp per 100kg in incredible...even compared with 175bhp per 170kg of litre sportsbike...thats like 0.9 bhp per kilo compared with about 1bhp per kilo...

But stick on an average man (80kg?) and this becomes 0.5bhp per kilo whereas the litre sports only drops to 0.7bhp per kilo...

Complete waste of money if you ask me! This is more to show off at chav conventions than anything else...like a supercharged Nissan Micra.

FJSRiDER. wrote (see)

ohlins916sp wrote (see)

An ant can defeat an elephant?  Has he taken a look at his Cagiva logo recently?

 
Has he looked at his tyres?

....his bike [...] is perfect for road-riding.

   

Yeah...it looks like just about the worst road bike possible.

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 08:52

What litre sportsbike makes 175bhp and weights 170kg?

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 11:54

I think the manufacturer quoted figures for a 2009 Fireblade are 170kg (dry) and 178bhp.

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 14:02

Gotcha, probably more like 200kg wet and 160 at the rear wheel. But anyway, it's not ust about numbers, it would be close...

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 17:12

Agreed, but that Cagiva is probably more like 75 at the wheel (with NOS boost) and 130kg wet.

Surely a guy that proud of his bike would have given the crank/dry figures?

If that's a 100kg wet weight, then that would make it weigh about 70kg with no fuel, NOS or oil!

I think it would be close, on a very specific type of track. That 90bhp has got to be with the NOS boost on (or that guy is the world's best two stroke tuner), and being two stroke it would have a very narrow power band...the GSXR would knock the crap out of it everytime it had to drop below 48000 revs...or when the NOS ran out!

I think it would need a VERY skilled, very light rider...huge amount of NOS and a 15 speed gearbox to really run with a Blade...

Posted: 19/06/2009 at 20:17

And what about all those 2 stroke siezures. High tuned 2 smokers are ace fun but a feckin nitemare.

 B

Posted: 23/06/2009 at 11:19

what a waste of money. you can have a desmo for that and that is a rare bike which is a shit load faster than a stupid unreliable stroker machine. power to weight ratios are nothing, im thinking he has about 5FTLBS of torque, nothing.

yes i do own a V twin hence the torque statement

he is italian though, look who they elected for president...........  

Posted: 23/06/2009 at 16:53

I agree. More money than sense.

Posted: 23/06/2009 at 16:57

i had this bike and did exactly what you did..it was wank!!!!! why would you spend that much on that?? what a waste of time and money. what you want is a peugeot xr6 50 mate, they are amazing..much faster!

Posted: 27/04/2011 at 13:18

Gorguz bike its a shame all the negative comments by ppl who sound as if there 18yr old brits who dont own or know a thing about motorbikes ! Good work pal love 2 strokes there hard work but worth it in every way !

Posted: 28/04/2011 at 11:41