No jail for 150mph biker

Speeding biker offers guilty plea after denying charge for almost two years

Posted: 3 August 2010
by Visordown News

A MOTORCYCLIST from Cornwall escaped jail yesterday after admitting speeding at 150mph on his Kawasaki sportsbike in Devon.

Earlier this year, Visordown reported the news of Oliver Marriot, 21, from Saltash, who was caught by a mobile speed camera on the A38 near Plymouth in December 2008.

Initially, Mr Marriot planned to challenge the speeding charge on the grounds the Police's equipment was inaccurate but yesterday (Monday) at Plymouth Crown Court he changed his plea, admitting dangerous driving and having no insurance.

He was jailed for 23 weeks - suspended for two years - and ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid community work. Marriot was also banned from driving for two years.

Admitting to the court was an inexperienced rider, Marriot was caught speeding on a Kawasaki ZX-636 just two weeks after passing his test.

Judge Francis Gilbert QC said the speeding was the "worst of any case in any court in the West Country".


Previous article
Suzuki V-Strom Concept for Donington
Next article
Supervised driver law comes under scrutiny


camera, Speeding biker
TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle


Discuss this story

Quote from above - "He was jailed for 23 weeks" erm ... am I missing something in the title?

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 11:38

erm, you may not understand the meaning of the word 'suspended' maybe ;o)

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 12:15

In that traffic ? Should have had the book thrown at him ........

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 12:40

" A MOTORCYCLIST from Cornwall escaped jail yesterday after admitting speeding at 150mph on his Kawasaki sportsbike in Devon."

No He DIDN'T!

He "admitting dangerous driving and having no insurance.!"

Never let the facts get in the way of a good headline! 

He was well and truely stitched up. He did not do 150mph! You can't brake to 70 in under 2 seconds from 150.  His speed could have been easily measured in terms of time and distance and was estimated at 89mph.

So he was jailed for doing 89 mph! 

 Shocking!


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 12:44

If he was doing 150mph he should be jailed, its idiots like this who screw things up for the rest of us, want to go that fast... do a track day like the rest of us.

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 13:36

Sorry mikepryterch, cannot agree with that one.

 Just do it where you are not likely to be caught. I guess he will have learnt that lesson now.


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 13:57

150 miles per hour with the van halfway in his lane?  Interesting.

 America is having all sorts of questions regarding both red light and (newly acquired) speed cameras.  Anytime a defendant takes the case to court it is usually thrown out due to astonishing inaccuracies and failure of a licensed police officer to actually witness the infraction (photos are considered heresay evidence except in cases of a felony charge). 

 I believe the defendant changed his plea not because he did or did not do it, but because his attorney said the possibility of losing a jury trial always exists, but a plea bargain is a guarantee. 


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 14:12

Well having no insurance  is the  crime  . As for speeding  can we all honestly say we havnt done it

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 14:21

I think if everyone that had cracked 150 on the street ever (heck, doing that on a car is probably worse as you can do more damage) went to jail for half a year it would be a pretty unreasonable situation.    Its hard to make conclusions about the traffic but I'd assume either he wasn't doing 150 or there was no one past that and he had more room than the photo makes it appear.    Maybe there was no one around and he had been cruising for a while not paying attention, and then was jamming on the brakes as he hit traffic.  Stupid mistake but you don't send a guy to jail for half a year for something like that when taking his license for a longer time would probably be safer to other citizens.  The fact that jail time was even on the table was pretty absurd.  I bet a bike at 150 has the same damaging ability or less than a car at 120 or so if you consider the size...

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 14:53

Rob B:  simplifying slightly, this is GCSE physics:  kinetic energy = 1/2 mv squared. 

Assuming a point mass for shits and giggles,  175kg bike at 150mph  = something very approximately like 392,787 joules.

A 1500kg mid sized car travelling at the dual carriageway legal limit of 70 mph gives a rough figure of 739,429. 

Although energy increases based on the square of speed, the car is so much heavier that the energy delivered to what it hits is likely to be far greater, even at a much lower velocity.  In fact, the car on that road would likely be doing 80, so you do the math.  

The lesson is, if you have a choice between being rear-ended by a flying squaddie on a sportsbike or a careless fucker in a 5 series playing with the radio, you are far better off choosing the squaddie.

This raises the fairly obvious question of why the car drivers you will see every day driving  in a deliberately careless manner (looking down to play with the radio or aircon, changing lane without a proper signal, failing to keep a safe following distance) are not threatened with a 6 month stretch?   


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 15:19

There is no way that this can possibly be 150 mph! Watch the video in this link:

 http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Motorcyclist-denies-racing-city-150mph/article-2020072-detail/article.html


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 16:21

funny the speed camera seems to have 150 up on the screen so either the equipment is not correctly calibrated, or all of you spanners claiming he is not doing 150 truly are spanners. who the fuck gets down behind the screen to do 89MPH???

anyways mikeprytherch is so right, keep ya speed on the track. fair enough every biker goes over the speed limit now and again, i was caught doing 90 on a motorway, but there is absolutely no need to do 150MPH on the highway, its completely mindless and unnecessary and like the other bloke said, it makes us all look bad. save ya speed for the track. 

anyways anyone can go fast in a straight line, just point and squirt. i'd be shocked if he had any know-how on how to tackle a corner, just like the other riders who seem to think that doing 150MPH on the road is acceptable. 

Rant over. 


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 16:50

Can a Kawasaki 636 actually GET up to 150 MPH - especially on such a short/busy stretch?

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 17:23

agree jim, no way is that 150mph with the distance that van is ahead of him and the speed its travelling at (as its clearly changing lanes into more dense traffic) he would never be able to avoid it. cops should stick their equipment where id like to!!!!!

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 17:53

 http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Motorcyclist-denies-racing-city-150mph/article-2020072-detail/article.html

by jove i think youve solved it, good work mr A. Guest i watched the link and its so obvious this is another media scare story, isnt it sad how many bikers turn on their own without looking at the evidence first! Are these people really bikers that never break the law, nor take chances. Im ashamed to think so many of my so-called brothers steam right in behind the police every time like brain-dead sheeple. The police themselves are pretty adept at breaking laws when the want. The pigs! watch again sheeple


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 18:08

anyone who thinks that he is doing 150 has never done 150 on the road i have a zx12 and a zzr1400 and getting anywhere near that speed takes a while to get there and a while to stop.  I got stoped doing 57 in a 30 when i know i was not i was doing 40.  Many moons ago i was caught doing 120 on a motorway on a zx9 i was doing over 150 as it was quiet when a van for no reason moved into the right hand lane (only me and him on the road) i had to under take and even with braking i was doing 120.  so top tip if you want to speed and get away with it make sure you have just commited a serious crime as they seem to get far less of a punishment.  and before any one says yes i can go round bends as well

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 18:18

FWIW, also agree with Messrs Guest and Corleone - there's no way on God's good earth that he was doing 150mph.

And yes Mr Sradman, some people do get behind the bubble as "slow" as 89mph - unlike those of us who are too fat to get down at speeds considerably faster than that...


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 18:36

There are good reasons some counties have stopped using speed guns, see an interesting internal Kent police memo on this link http://www.speed-trap.co.uk/news.htm and read on. We know the law is there for a reason but the police have a responsibility to ensure their evidence is true.

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 18:48

FWIW Flat out on a GSXR1000 K6 at Portimao on the straight I only managed 160mph as recorded by GPS and that was a wide racetrack with a long gentle right hander leading up to the bend. No way is that guy doing a true 150mph.

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 19:53

"admitting dangerous driving and having no insurance.!"

 Having no insurance is in my opinion a much worse offence than most speeding, even near speeds of '150mph'.  

An accident at below the speed limit can leave victims with dramatic permanent injuries. 

He's a twat for riding his sports bike around with no insurance. Nuff said.

Oh, and braking in two seconds, you can be doing much higher than 89 to get to 70, it's not a bicycle. 


Posted: 03/08/2010 at 23:02

A travesty - not even close to the claimed speed and every traffic cop would know that just from looking at the video - As for the numpties on here having a pop - very disappointing - why don't you go take up plane spotting or something.

Posted: 03/08/2010 at 23:16

Having watched the video I have to agree. 90mph is much closer to the truth and no way is it 150.

My understanding is the laser will only give a true reading on a flat surface - therefore a number plate - and you can see where the laser is pointing from the cross hairs in the video. It's all over the place.

Shouldn't have pleaded guilty.

That said, according to the newspaper article he only had a licence for a 25KW bike and he'd only passed two weeks before. With that level of inexperience it was probably only a matter of time before he had a biggie.

Doesn't make it right though.


Posted: 04/08/2010 at 12:04

Talkback: No jail for 150mph biker