That's fair enough. It's their ball and they can insure who they like.
Why is it based on age and not experience though? Surely risk is a result of your experience and not your age. Wouldn't a 20 yr old bike with 3 years continuous experience be less risk than a 30 yr old just pased biker?
Not that I am 20 
nor have I three years experience 
Looks like it will be handy for the occasional rebuild for tax/mot but I wouldn't rely on it, the terms are fairly draconian. Lock it up with a mechanical device every time?
The thirty year old limit is just the half of it, you need FIVE years bike licence too.
Too bad for all you noobs then 
Screwd.
Posted: 15/08/2008 09:12
