throwback wrote
yeah, didn't look too good when they showed it in slow mo.i reckon he's out for the rest of the tournament. which leaves us up front with rooney, who can't last a full match, crouch! ffs, the less said the better and a 17 year old who hasn't even played a first team, match for his club yet! it's coming home? yeah, it's coming home. the team bus in about 5 friggin days.
crouch! ffs, the less said the better
Quote
ungainly southern shandy drinking freakshow
Count Steer wrote
For long periods they actually looked as good as most of the others - with the possible exception of Argentina. Individually they looked very good. It just needs to gel and stay gelled.
Scavenger wrote
Shouldn't even be there IMO, he's always been injury prone and he hasn't exactly been banging em in every week at club level. He is there on past glories.
rainmaker wrote
You can't have been watching the same Crouch as me then.Crouch has played remarkably well. His first touch has been excellent, he's held it up well, tackled, laid it off (after holding it up), he's run round and closed players down for 90 minutes a game and he's scored. He's done all this whilst knowing he's going to be dropped the second Rooney could play.He might look like an ungainly southern shandy drinking freakshow, but he's been ace.And no, I'm not a Liverpool fan or Crouchaphile.
R1wobbler wrote
Agree with that 100% - he's been outstanding for us, probably our best player in the tournament so far.....fuck knows what throwback has been watching
Trace wrote
You obviously missed the goals he scored in the run up to the World Cup and in the first round then
£5395
£12995
£5995